Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: High level of IP vandalism on contentious subject in the news. BobFromBrockley (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 21:21, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent IP user(s) preemptively changing infobox parameters in light of recent news of the expected changeover from Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney. Leventio (talk) 04:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done Now moot as Carney has been sworn in. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing - sockpuppetry from IP known for WP:GENREWARRIOR. HorrorLover555 (talk) 05:06, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep inserting "Greek Cypriot" and similar, with no citations. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: There is a back and forth over what image should be used in the infobox. Since this just happened, semi protection temporarily would prevent constant image changing by IP addresses. Ktkvtsh (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, seems to have been solved, apologies for not reacting earlier. Ymblanter (talk) 21:40, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 09:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Constantly vandalised by IP sock Scoophole2021 (talk). 11:49, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 21:42, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: malicious content posted by unknown person. Request edit and then protection Keshav Prakash DOP (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I've removed the unsourced information. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated vandalism, mostly IP but sometimes by newly registered users. Minimal constructive edits from IP users. It's also an ongoing controversial, contentious topic, which puts the article at a more strict encyclopedic standard. In addition, the topic is high-profile with various political views involved in the current events, which could potentially conflicting with the neutrality of the article, if anyone can edit it. Requesting indefinite semi-protection. Pradedovići (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Could you clarify what you mean by this? Pradedovići (talk) 20:52, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pradedovići: Eastern Europe and the Balkans are considered a contentious topic, where administrators can impose special rules and restrictions on both editors and pages. IanDBeacon, I think that administrators can recognise which areas are contentious topics and shouldn't feel obliged to use the procedure when normal protections would work. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:37, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopper. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP-hopper. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection: Edit warring against consensus. Koshuri (グ) 17:58, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    If I may. I would ask for Indefinite Sock ECP, considering recent disruptions by bunch of sockfarms:
    Garuda Talk! 21:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep on removing sourced content and sources and adds unsourced content [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: WP:GSRUSUKR; IPs adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 18:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated edits by anon IPs removing reference to the commonly-used epoch for ISO 8601 dates, presumably due to relevance to current political issues. (Should be fine to leave open to editing by actual logged-in users for now.) Auros (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There are political issues connected to May 20, 1875. But the date is no longer in the ISO 8601 standard and the removals by certain IP editors were well reasoned. Jc3s5h (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Looks like the IPs were, for once, on the side of the angels. Favonian (talk) 22:04, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of reverted edits by new users and IPs. They should use the talk page. Mach61 19:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    doh, shouldn't have selected "vandalism" as the reason in twinkle Mach61 21:33, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:58, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: sock puppetry & editwarring Magherbin (talk) 20:01, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet IPs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Realityteav. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:27, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Ip vandalism changing boxoffice figure without citing reliable source. Already reverted four times but 103.163.117.229 IP keeps making disruptive change. RangersRus (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced and unfounded information by several IPs for self-promotion. SGT64 (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There are several problems related to this page. I suspect that the two editors doing frequent reverts, which include an uncited DOB for a child, are the same person (i.e. sockpuppet) and probably COI. I'm not sure where else to report this, but in the meantime can the page be semi-protected so that I can restore it to a version which does not include exact DOB (per WP:DOB), in the first instance, please?. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:CT/A-I. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I did not identify any edit by an unconfirmed user in the last several years that wasn't vandalism or drive-by disruption. Remsense ‥  04:47, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The frequency of approximately every three months would probably lead to pending-changes protection as it isn't high enough for semi-protection in my opinion, but unfortunately it isn't available for the Help: namespace. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of promotional material by IP editors. Tacyarg (talk) 07:01, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 14:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: edit warring and weird comparisons to Jesus Christ in see also. Borgenland (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unbelievable amount of IP and throwaway vandalism. Anwegmann (talk) 16:28, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 17:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. After page protection expires, Ip users return and did again vandalism on article, even if semi protection, some users deleting source, needed indefinite semi protection, please protect the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohiths90 (talkcontribs) 17:27, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues by IPS after unprotected. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 18:04, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism throughout page history, new F1 season will see uptick in this. MB2437 18:13, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – High-impact event, need to fend off persistent addition of unsourced content. MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 18:39, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Recurring and ongoing insertion of unsourced BLP content. Since at least September 2024, one or more anonymous editors are repeatedly insert an unsourced date of birth for this person. Since October 2024, such edits are being made by one or more anonymous editors with an IP address that begins with 2600:1007:b0XX. Requesting page protection. Dmoore5556 (talk) 19:45, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2600:1007:b000::/40 (talk · contribs). 6-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removing sourced info, against consensus, multiple editors reverting their edits. This article has had similar problems with IP editors in the past. Andrew Englehart (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    The matter has been quite obviously resolved.77.22.105.171 (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 22:36, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: I am trying to correct incorrect information and references on this page Osbournedebulbec (talk) 16:15, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Wevie Stonder is not protected. Please try to do better than 82.42.151.52 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) with regard to providing reliable sources. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.